hola@alterbiblio.com
LinkedIn

Home > Insights > Medical Writing

MEDICAL WRITING: WHAT IT IS, WHO NEEDS IT.

Writing a scientific document well isn't a final formality — it's part of the method. Medical writing is the discipline that handles this, and it spans everything from the dossier submitted to a regulatory agency to the manuscript sent to a journal. What types exist, what a medical writer actually does, and when it makes sense to bring in outside support.

María García-Puente

By María García-Puente · Research · July 2026

What medical writing is

Medical writing is the professional practice of drafting, editing, and preparing scientific documents in healthcare: protocols, clinical study reports, manuscripts, training materials, patient-facing content. The person who does this work, the medical writer, combines scientific knowledge, command of the language, and familiarity with the regulatory, editorial, and ethical standards that govern each type of document.

It's a well-established profession. Professional associations with decades of history represent medical writers and provide training: AMWA (the American Medical Writers Association) in the United States and EMWA (the European Medical Writers Association) in Europe. Its existence answers a simple reality: researchers and clinical teams don't always have the time — and sometimes not the craft either — to turn their data into documents that are clear, correct, and compliant with every formal requirement. That's exactly what the medical writer brings to the table.

The three main types of medical writing

Very different kinds of work live under the same label. Broadly, there are three main types:

  • Regulatory writing. The most tightly governed of the three. It covers the documents the industry submits to regulatory agencies (EMA, FDA, AEMPS): clinical trial protocols, clinical study reports (CSRs), investigator brochures, modules of the registration dossier, agency responses and briefing documents. Here creativity barely matters and precision is everything: standardized formats (like the CORE Reference template for CSRs or the CTD format for dossiers), templates, controlled terminology, and strict regulatory deadlines.
  • Scientific or publication writing. The kind that carries results to the scientific community: manuscripts for journals, abstracts and congress posters, literature reviews. It's governed by the rules of the publishing world (the ICMJE recommendations, reporting guidelines such as CONSORT or PRISMA depending on the study design, each journal's instructions) and demands, beyond good writing, knowing how to navigate the publication process: choosing a journal, responding to reviewers, managing timelines.
  • Educational or lay writing. Training materials for healthcare professionals, continuing medical education (CME) content, patient materials, plain-language content. The challenge here is one of translation: keeping scientific rigor while adapting the register for non-specialist audiences, without sliding into misleading oversimplification or impenetrable jargon.

In practice, writers specialize: a good regulatory writer isn't automatically a good manuscript writer, and vice versa. Worth keeping in mind when hiring.

The medical writer's profile and skill set

There's no single medical writing degree. The typical background is in health or life sciences (medicine, pharmacy, biology, nursing) with writing skills developed on top, or, less commonly, a communications background with solid scientific grounding acquired later. On that foundation, the skills that make the difference are:

  • Critical appraisal of the scientific literature: understanding a paper, spotting its limitations, and knowing what evidence actually backs each claim.
  • Source and reference management: searching well, citing well, and verifying every citation. A manuscript with references that don't say what's attributed to them is a serious problem, more so now that AI-generated drafts are common.
  • Knowledge of the standards: ICMJE and reporting guidelines on the editorial side; agency requirements and good clinical practice on the regulatory side.
  • Scientific English, because most output is published in English, plus careful command of the local language for everything else.
  • Project and author management: coordinating versions, comments, and sign-off from multiple co-authors with impossible schedules is, often, half the job.

Best practice: authorship, transparency, and the shadow of ghostwriting

You can't talk about medical writing without addressing the question it always raises: if a professional writes the text, whose paper is it? The answer has been well established for years, and it's worth knowing, because it's what separates legitimate practice from the kind that isn't.

The ICMJE recommendations define who can be listed as an author: someone who contributes substantially to the work, takes part in drafting or critically revising the text, approves the final version, and takes responsibility for the whole. A medical writer engaged to draft a document usually doesn't meet all those criteria and therefore doesn't sign as an author; the correct approach is to acknowledge their contribution, along with who funded their work. That's exactly what the GPP 2022 guidelines (Good Publication Practice, the reference standard for industry-sponsored publications) and the joint AMWA–EMWA–ISMPP position statement on the role of the professional medical writer set out.

Ghostwriting — a professional writing the text while their involvement is concealed — is malpractice that editors and the professional associations themselves have flagged for years. The line separating it from legitimate medical writing isn't who types the words, but transparency: declared contribution, declared funding, and real authors who direct the content and take responsibility for it. A professional medical writer working to GPP standards isn't a ghost; they're a recognized specialist named in the document itself.

IN SHORT

The line between legitimate medical writing and ghostwriting isn't who types the words — it's whether the contribution and the funding are disclosed.

In-house or outsourced? When to bring in outside help

Do you need a medical writer on staff, or will outside support do? The answer mostly comes down to volume and regularity:

  • It makes sense to keep it in-house when there's a steady flow of documents of the same type: a company running several active trials on a continuous regulatory calendar can justify its own regulatory writing team, and a scientific society with high output can justify a standing editorial role.
  • It makes sense to outsource it when the need is one-off or irregular: the research group publishing two or three papers a year, the hospital trying to turn its results into manuscripts, the journal that needs to shore up the formal quality of what it receives, the small company without a properly resourced medical department. Keeping a senior writer on staff for occasional workload peaks rarely pays off.

There's a third, very common situation, where the problem isn't the writing itself but everything around it: the literature search that underpins the introduction and discussion, reference verification, compliance with reporting guidelines, journal selection, the submission process. That author support, of which medical writing is one piece, is exactly what our research support service covers: we work with the researcher from the evidence all the way to submission, with the transparency ICMJE and GPP call for. And when the context is a journal rather than an author, that same expertise applies through editorial management; if what you want is for your own team to write and publish better on its own, we cover that in our training courses. Medical Affairs, for its part, shares much of this same ground from the side of scientific communication within the industry.

Sources

María García-Puente

María García-Puente

Co-founder of AlterBiblio

Co-founder of AlterBiblio. Information specialist with a background in technology. She has spent more than a decade managing Spanish-language scholarly journals. Executive Master's in AI (2023).


KEEP READING

MORE INSIGHTS

INSIGHT · EDITORIAL

PEER REVIEW

How peer review works, and what an author can do to avoid getting stuck in limbo.

READ POST

INSIGHT · CONTEXTA

CONTEXT ENGINEERING

How the information an AI model consumes gets organized.

READ POST

SERVICE

TRAINING

Courses to help your team write and publish better on its own.

VIEW SERVICE